The difference between a reply and a block is one specific sentence. LinkedGrow writes the first message from the post or comment that surfaced the person, asks something they can answer in one line, and sends a single follow-up before it stops. No email, no enrichment, and nothing that could have been sent to anybody else.
7-day trial · Cancel before day 7 · Everything included
How do you write LinkedIn cold outreach that gets replies?
Open on something the person actually said, give one sentence of why that brought you to them, and ask a question they can answer in a line. Keep it under 600 characters and send one follow-up at most. LinkedGrow drafts exactly that from the post that surfaced each lead.
Your prospects receive several a day. They have become very good at recognising them. The template with a first name in it, the compliment that fits anyone, the calendar link in the opening line. None of it fails because it is automated. It fails because the reader can tell it was written before they were chosen.
Readers pattern-match on the shape before they read the words. A first line that could apply to any of 500 people is filed instantly, and everything after it goes unread no matter how good it is.
LinkedIn is a small world inside any given niche. A message that reads as spam does not just fail, it costs you that person permanently and sometimes the people they talk to.
Tools that bolt email onto LinkedIn add domain reputation, enrichment bills and deliverability to a job that was already hard. Two mediocre channels lose to one that is genuinely well run.
A first message that fills the screen is answered later, and later usually means never. Length is the easiest thing to fix and the last thing anybody edits.
I can tell in the first line whether a human picked me, and I answer the ones where they did...
Nothing here is a trick. It is the sequence a thoughtful person would follow if they had time to do it for every prospect.
Sourcing does not return names, it returns names attached to something they did: a comment, a question, a role change. If there is no reason, the person does not enter the queue.
The draft starts where the reason is, says in one sentence why it brought you here, and ends on a question. You can read every draft before it goes out while you are still building trust in it.
One follow-up, then the person is dropped from the sequence for good. They are also remembered, so no other agent in your workspace approaches them later as if nothing happened.
The test for every message: could this have been sent to somebody else? If yes, it will read as bulk no matter how well written it is.
The first line refers to the post or comment that surfaced them, in the language they used. That single sentence is doing more work than any subject-line trick, because it proves a person read something before writing.
One question they can answer in a line. A meeting request is a big commitment to a stranger, and once somebody has answered anything at all the conversation is warm, which is when asking makes sense.
Under 600 characters for a first message, which is about 4 lines on a phone. The invitation note is capped at 300 by LinkedIn itself. Both limits are treated as targets rather than ceilings, because a shorter message reads as a person typing quickly.
A single nudge about a week later recovers the people who saw it on a bad day. Anything after that is noise, so there is no third message to configure and no setting that turns one on.
Short answers to what people ask most often.
Write one line about what you sell and we will answer honestly.
Email us directlyMessaging somebody who has never heard of you, on LinkedIn rather than by email. The medium changes the rules: there is no spam folder, the note is capped at 300 characters, and the person can see exactly who you are before deciding to answer.
The generic version stopped working years ago and the specific version never did. A message quoting something the person wrote last week gets read because it could not have been sent to anybody else, which is the whole test.
No. Ask a question they can answer in one line. A calendar link is a large commitment to somebody who does not know you, and once they have replied about anything the second message is no longer cold.
No, and that is deliberate. There is no email column anywhere in the product, no enrichment credits and no domain reputation to manage. One channel done properly beats two done at half attention.
A merge fills a name into one sentence you wrote. Here every message starts from the specific post or comment that surfaced the person, so two people in the same job at the same company get different messages, because they said different things.
The agent opens on the thing they said, asks something answerable, and stops after one follow-up. Give it your website address and read the first drafts before anything is sent.
7-day trial · Cancel before day 7 · Everything included
